Ohlander v. Larson’s Empirical Analysis
114 F.3d 1531 · 1997
Citation profile
32 federal appellate · 11 district · 13 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 104 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably Miller v. Miller (2001), Aventis Pasteur, Inc. v. Skevofilax (2007)
32 federal appellate · 11 district · 13 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 11601 (International Child Abduction Remedies Act) · 42 U.S.C. § 11602 · 42 U.S.C. § 11603 · 42 U.S.C. § 11604
Relies on Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al. · Anderson v. Dunn · Spallone v. United States · Mobley v. McCormick · McCord v. Bailey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[1] the opposing party's effort and expense in preparing for trial; [2] excessive delay and lack of diligence on the part of the movant; [8] insufficient explanation of the need for a dismissal; and [4] the present stage of the litigation.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. R.P. v. K.S.W. · In Re Varona“A clear example of an abuse of discretion exists where the trial court fails to consider the applicable legal standard or the facts upon which the exercise of its discretionary judgment is based.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[albsent 'legal prejudice' to the defendant, the [trial] court normally should grant such a dismissal.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.