United States v. Dingle’s Empirical Analysis
114 F.3d 307 · 1997
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently June 2018
16 federal appellate · 1 district · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · United States v. Olano · Griffin v. United States · Sowashee Venture v. EB, Inc. · Rauer v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“limited to the question of whether 'any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“'the defendant’s testimony, on its face, [is] utterly inconsistent, incoherent, contradictory, or implausible,’ ” and therefore,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hepburn“sufficient to establish constructive possession.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.