Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 F.3d 415 - Mengine v. Runyon

Mengine v. Runyon’s Empirical Analysis

114 F.3d 415 · 1997

Citation profile

131
cited by 131 later decisions
6
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 10 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 131 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably Aka v. Washington Hospital Center (1998), Calero-Cerezo v. United States Department of Justice (2004)

52 federal appellate · 10 district · 14 state decisions

6501997200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on School Board of Nassau County Florida v. H Arline · McKinney v. Baldwin · In re Geschke · Vande Zande v. State of Wisconsin Department of Administration R · Beck v. University of Wisconsin Board of Regents

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 131 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he purpose of the interactive process is to determine the appropriate accommodations: `[t]his process should identify the precise limitations resulting from the disability and the potential reasonable accommodations that could overcome those limitations.'”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “In many cases, an employee will not have the ability or resources to identify a vacant position absent participation by the employer.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Once a qualified individual with a disability has requested provision of a reasonable accommodation, the employer must make a reasonable effort to determine the appropriate accommodation. The appropriate reasonable accommodation is best determined through a flexible, interactive process that involves both the employer and the [employee] with a disability.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.