United States v. Mackey’s Empirical Analysis
114 F.3d 470 · 1997
Citation profile
12 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently January 2011
12 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1343 · 18 U.S.C. § 371
Relies on Chapman v. State of California · Delaware v. Van Arsdall · Arizona v. Fulminante · Rose v. Clark · United States v. Hasting
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In this Circuit, it is settled that a § 3B1.3 enhancement is appropriate for a physician who abuses the trust of his patients. However, this Circuit has never considered whether a physician who acts in concert with his patients to conduct a fraudulent billing scheme may be assessed a § 3B1.3 enhancement for abuse of a position of trust on the basis of the physician's relationship with an insurance company.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the position of trust must have contributed in some significant way to facilitating the commission or concealment of the offense,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“no criminal punishment may be regarded as fundamentally fair.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.