Scott v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis
114 F.3d 51 · 1997
Citation profile
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 67 later decisions — most recently July 2021 · most notably Olabisiomotosho v. City of Houston (1999), Deville v. Marcantel (2009)
21 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Farmer v. Brennan · Bell v. Wolfish · City of Canton v. Harris · Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. Brown · Wilson v. Seiter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 67 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“challenge as an attack on a 'condition of confinement' or as an 'episodic act or omission.'”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“case, an actor usually is interposed between the detainee and the municipality, such that the detainee complains first of a particular act of, or omission by, the actor and then points derivatively to a policy, custom, or rule (or lack thereof) of themunicipality that permitted or caused the act or omission. 28 Id. at 53. With respect to an”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) that the municipal employee violated the pretrial detainee's clearly established constitutional rights with subjective deliberate indifference; and (2) that this violation resulted from a municipal policy or custom adopted and maintained with objective deliberate indifference.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.