Hill v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
114 F.3d 78 · 1997
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently June 2011
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Landgraf v. USI Film Products · Barefoot v. Estelle · Drinkard v. Johnson · Brown v. Cain · William C. Houchin, Jr. v. Aristedes W. Zavaras, Director, Colorado Department of Corrections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“The certificate of appealability under paragraph (1) shall indicate which specific issue or issues satisfy the showing required by paragraph (2).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lackey v. Johnson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.