Osler v. Ware’s Empirical Analysis
114 F.3d 91 · 1997
Citation profile
7 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Painewebber Incorporated v. H. William Hofmann · Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Cohen · Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. McCoy · Smith Barney, Inc. v. Sarver · Painewebber Inc. v. Hofmann
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“No dispute, claim or controversy shall be eligible for submission to arbitration under this Code where six (6) years have elapsed from the occurrence or event giving rise to the act or dispute, claim or controversy. This section shall not extend applicable statutes of limitation, nor shall it apply to any ease which is directed to arbitration by a court of competent jurisdiction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.