Castro v. Roe

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 3, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-12-03

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2005

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brewer v. Hall

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-12-03

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1MEMORANDUM…

¶2Thomas A. Castro, a California state prisoner, appeals the denial of his habeas corpus petition brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. He contends that California Jury Instruction 17.41.1 violated his constitutional rights. This contention is foreclosed by Brewer v. Hall, 378 F.3d 952, 957 (9th Cir.2004). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment.

¶3AFFIRMED.

¶4 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.