Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

114 F. App'x 407

Reddick v. Washington

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided November 29, 2004

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-11-29

Relies on Salahuddin v. Cuomo

Decided 2004-11-29

¶1 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

¶2This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

¶3*408ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order filed April 28, 2004 be affirmed. The court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing appellant’s action without prejudice for noncompliance with Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). See, e.g., Salahuddin v. Cuomo, 861 F.2d 40, 42-43 (2d Cir.1988).

¶4Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

/114/fappx/407 · .json · Public domain