In Re: Fredrick v.

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided December 10, 2004

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2004-12-10

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2005

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2004-12-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Ralph Franklin Fredrick petitions for a writ of mandamus, alleging the district court has unduly delayed acting on his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. He seeks an order from this court directing the district court to act. We find there has been no undue delay in the district court. Accordingly, we deny the mandamus petition, deny Fredrick’s motion to expand the record, and deny his motion to expedite. Although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 PETITION DENIED