In re Johnson’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Banks v. Siegel · Cupples Co. Manufacturers v. National Labor Relations Board · Morris Plan Industrial Bank v. Parker · Cunningham v. Elco Distributors, Inc. · Federal Provision Co. v. Ershowsky
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * The present objecting creditor has full standing in law to contest the discharge of this bankrupt, although the ground of objection relates to the false financial statement received by a former creditor and one not a party in the present bankruptcy. Indeed if the policy of the law were otherwise it would invite mischievous consequences. The natural impulse of a hard pressed debtor, knowing he had resorted to false financial statements, would be to leave no stone unturned in trying to pay cf. creditors victimized by such financial statements, as a hedge and in the hopes of forestalling potential opposition to discharge in event of bankruptcy. In other words, there would be a great urge to attempt preferential payments. * * * ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Hanson““Even if Parker [the objector] in fact had been actively implicated in said financial statement, it does not follow that would defeat this opposition to the bankrupt’s discharge.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Hanson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.