Schwartz v. Strauss’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
June 1968
most recently cited
4 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1001
Relies on Estep v. United States · Falbovs v. United States · Heikkila v. Barber · Billings v. Truesdell · United States v. Kauten
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It appears that the plaintiff’s remedy is by way of habeas corpus after induction or by refusing to be inducted after the administrative process is complete, Estep v. United States, 327 U.S. 114 , 66 S.Ct. 423 , 90 L.Ed. 567 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.