Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Ga. App. 529 - Smith v. Maples

114 Ga. App. 529 - Smith v. Maples’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
January 1995
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Holmes v. Clisby · 4 Ga. App. 191 - Tifton, Thomasville & Gulf Railway Co. v. Butler · Equitable Loan & Security Co. v. Lewman · 53 Ga. App. 638 - Firemen's Insurance v. Oliver · Snowden v. Waterman & Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In an action upon contract seeking damages for the breach of a contract and attorney’s fees under Code § 20-1404 (the predecessor to O.C.G.A. § 13-6-11) as an expense of litigation because of bad faith, the trial judge charged the jury that ‘the term ‘bad faith’ has a meaning which is the opposite of good faith. It means bad purpose, bad intent, bad state of knowledge or desire.’ There is no error in the charge.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.