Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Haw. 1 - State v. Romano

State v. Romano’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently November 2021

1 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

80200720102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roe v. Wade · Griswold v. State of Connecticut · Olmstead v. United States · Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. P Casey P Casey · Eisenstadt v. Baird

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Matters of credibility and the weight of the evidence and the inferences to be drawn are for the fact finder.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when, despite evidence to support the finding, the appellate court is left with the definite and firm conviction in reviewing the entire evidence that a mistake has been committed. A finding of fact is also clearly erroneous when the record lacks substantial evidence to support the finding. We have defined substantial evidence as credible evidence which is of sufficient quality and probative value to enable a person of reasonable caution to support a conclusion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “sexual penetration,” “deviate sexual intercourse,” or”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.