Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Idaho 635 - State v. Eubank

State v. Eubank’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
April 2012
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2012 · most notably State v. Broadhead (1991), State v. Mauro (1991)

32 state decisions

1701988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Toohill · State v. Reinke · State v. Shideler · State v. Martinez · State v. Storey

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] fixed life sentence may be deemed reasonable if the offense is so egregious that it demands an exceptionally severe measure of retribution and deterrence, or if the offender so utterly lacks rehabilitative potential that imprisonment until death is the only feasible means of protecting society.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “It is well settled that hearsay information may be set forth in a presentence report, so long as the defendant is afforded an opportunity to present favorable evidence and to explain or rebut the adverse information. I.C.R. 32(e); State v. Mason, 107 Idaho 706 , 692 P.2d 350 (1984). However, hearsay information must be disregarded if there is no reasonable basis to deem it reliable, as where the information is simply conjecture. State v. Sensenig, 110 Idaho 83 , 714 P.2d 52 (Ct.App.1985).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Absent an executive commutation (an event which the judiciary can neither predict nor assume), a defendant given a fixed life sentence will be imprisoned until he [or she] dies.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.