Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 ILLAPP2D 120 - Hade v. Jontz

Hade v. Jontz’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 1989
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As between two innocent parties, one of whom must sustain a loss occasioned by the wrongdoing of a third party, the loss must be sustained by that party who could have prevented the loss....”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““Plaintiffs had made other loans through Spaulding and the evidence relating to the course of conduct was sufficient to warrant the conclusion that Spaulding was the plaintiff’s agent. Defendants, on the other hand, at no time knew of the interest of plaintiffs and were quite justified in making payments to Spaulding * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.