← 114 Ill. App. 3d 127 - Curtis v. Birch

114 Ill. App. 3d 127 - Curtis v. Birch’s Empirical Analysis

1983

Citation profile

cited by 55 later decisions

states following

January 2018

most recently cited

52 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 139 Ill. 2d 501 - Burdinie v. Village of Glendale Heights (1990), 169 Ill. App. 3d 78 - Swett v. Village of Algonquin (1988)

52 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Innkeepers of New Castle, Inc. v. Maley · 91 Ill. 2d 536 - People v. Huckstead · 71 Ill. 2d 583 - Frank v. Teachers Insurance & Annuity Ass'n of America · Department of Mental Health & Developmental Disabilities v. Civil Service Commission · Hodge v. South Carolina

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““Those few cases which have allowed an insured to recover, under an uninsured motorist’s provision of an auto insurance policy for intentional acts of the uninsured or unknown driver, involved injuries caused by the use of the auto as the instrumentality of the resultant injuries. (See Annot., 72 A.L.R.3d 1161 , 1164-68 (1976).)” Curtis v. Birch (1983), 114 Ill. App. 3d 127, 131 , 448 N.E.2d 591, 595 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 122 Ill. App. 3d 1061 - Country Companies v. Bourbon · 319 Ill. App. 3d 744 - State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Rosenberg
“§ 3636 Uninsured motorist coverage (A) No policy insuring against loss resulting from liability imposed by law for bodily injury or death suffered by any person arising out of the ownership, maintenance or use of a motor vehicle shall be issued, delivered, renewed, or extended in this state with respect to a motor vehicle registered or principally garaged in this state unless the policy includes the coverage described in subsection (B) of this section. (B) The policy referred to in subsection (A) of this section shall provide coverage therein or supplemental thereto for the protection of persons insured thereunder who are legally entitled to recover damages from owners or operators of uninsured motor vehicles and hit-and-run vehicles because of bodily injury, sickness or disease, including death resulting therefrom....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. Hulsey v. Mid-America Preferred Insurance Co.
““We have not found *** any indication that the legislature anticipated or intended that the liability of an insurer could be established by the intentional, criminal conduct, such as that involved here.” (Emphasis added.) (Curtis v. Birch (1983), 114 Ill. App. 3d 127, 130-31 , 448 N.E.2d 591 .)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 159 Ill. App. 3d 766 - Dyer v. American Family Insurance Co.

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.