Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Ind. App. 261 - Cooper v. Cooper

114 Ind. App. 261 - Cooper v. Cooper’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 1966
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 1966

7 state decisions

40194319501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Estate of Newhall · Pence v. Waugh · 113 Ind. App. 245 - Workman v. Workman · Greer v. State · Bundy v. McKnight

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Undue influence, in order to make a will void, must be directly connected with its execution and must operate at the time it is made. It must be an influence of such compelling force that the apparent testator is but the instrument by which the mastering desire of another is expressed, so that the supposed will, or the particular part in question, is not the will of the testator except in the sense that he has consented to put his name to it in the form in which it appears." (Our emphasis).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.