114 Ind. App. 55 - Schreiber v. Rickert’s Empirical Analysis
1943
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently May 1998 · most notably Lappinen v. Union Ore Co. (1947), 153 Ind. App. 92 - Wynder v. Lonergan (1972)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bimel Spoke & Wheel Co. v. Loper · 94 Ind. App. 29 - Barker v. Reynolds · 96 Ind. App. 320 - Flinn v. Hartley · Consumers Co. v. Ceislik · 94 Ind. App. 250 - Pettit v. Continental Baking Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . A stipulation of facts is an express waiver made in court or preparatory to trial, by the party or his attorney, conceding for the purposes of the trial the truthfulness of some alleged fact. It has the effect of a confessory pleading, in that the fact is thereafter to be taken for granted, so that the one party need offer no evidence to prove it and the other is not allowed to disprove it. It is a judicial admission of the fact or facts stipulated. Deffler v. Loudenbeck (1924), 233 Ill. App. 240, 245 . Serving as they do to simplify and expedite litigation, such stipulations “are looked upon with favor by the courts. When, upon a hearing in a compensation case, a stipulation of facts is entered into within the authority of counsel, it is, unless and until it is set aside or withdrawn, binding and conclusive between the parties and upon the Industrial Board. (Citingcases.)” Schreiber v. Rickert (1943), 114 Ind. App. 55 , 50 N. E. 2d 879 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.