State v. Turner’s Empirical Analysis
1923
Citation profile
12 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently January 1972
12 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Metz · State v. Ross · State v. Shaw · Hill v. Union Pacific Railroad
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The defendant is hardly in position to complain of the inadequacy of an instruction where he has made no objection to it nor requested a fuller instruction. Where the general charge of the court fairly presents the case to the jury, a party who desires an instruction upon a particular question should request it, and cannot predicate error upon the omission if he has not done so. (The State v. Ross, 77 Kan. 341 , 94 Pac. 270 ; The State v. Shaw, 79 Kan. 396 , 100 Pac. 78 .)””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hartsock · State v. Wood
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.