Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

114 Mass. 355

Sparhawk v. Sparhawk

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 15, 1874

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · decided 1874-01-15

Petition for a divorce from the bonds of matrimony, and for leave to marry again.

Relies on Graves v. Graves · Edgerly v. Edgerly · Bigelow v. Bigelow

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1874-01-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1982

7 state decisions

20187418801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Gray, C. J.

¶1The decree nisi under the St. of 1870, c. 404, § 3, did not dissolve the marriage. Graves v. Graves, 108 Mass. 314. Edgerly v. Edgerly, 112 Mass. 53. The repeal of that section by the St. of 1873, e. 371, § 5, did not make that decree an absolute divorce, but took away the authority which the court had under that section, as held in Bigelow v. Bigelow, 108 Mass. 38, to make it absolute on the petition of either party. By the express terms of the St. of 1873, c. 371, § 3, the authority thereby conferred upon the court to grant a divorce from the bond of matrimony can be exercised only “ on petition of any party to whom a divorce nisi, or a divorce from bed and board has teen granted.” The petitioner, not being the party to whom, but being the party against whom, the divorce nisi was decreed, is not therefore entitled to a divorce from the bond of matrimony. And not being divorced from the bond of matrimony, he cannot have leave, under the St. of 1873, c. 371, § 4, to marry again.

¶2Petition dismissed.

/114/mass/355 · .json · Public domain