Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Mich. App. 760 - Brownell v. Brown

114 Mich. App. 760 - Brownell v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 1991
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(d) Challenges for Cause. The parties may challenge jurors for cause, and the court shall rule on each challenge. A juror challenged for cause may be directed to answer questions pertinent to the inquiry. It is grounds for a challenge for cause that the person: (1) is not qualified to be a juror; (2) has been convicted of a felony; (3) is biased for or against a party or attorney; (4) shows a state of mind that will prevent the person from rendering a just verdict, or has formed a positive opinion on the facts of the case or on what the outcome should be; (5) has opinions or conscientious scruples that would improperly influence the person’s verdict; (6) has been subpoenaed s a witness in the action; (7) has already sat on a trial of the same issue; (8) has served as a grand or petit juror in a criminal case based on the same transaction; (9) is related within the ninth degree (civil law) of consanguinity or affinity to one of the parties or attorneys; (10) is the guardian, conservator, ward, landlord, tenant, employer, employee, partner, or client of a party or attorney; (11) is or has been a party adverse to the challenging party or attorney in a civil action, or has complained of or has been accused by that party in a criminal prosecution; (12) has a financial interest other than that of a taxpayer in the outcome of the action; (13) is interested in a question like the issue to be tried. Exemption form jury service is the privilege of the person exempt, not a ground for ch”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.