114 Mo. App. 128 - Judd v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis
1905
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 1972 · most notably Judd v. Walker (1908), Mabardy v. McHugh (1909)
3 federal appellate · 36 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Labbe v. Corbett · Clark's v. Hannibal · Mead v. . Bunn · Linington v. Strong · McGhee v. Bell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the general doctrine laid down in the books as elementary is that the doctrine of notice and means of knowledge has no application where distinct and positive representations of fact have been made, have been relied upon, and have induced action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kearns v. Sparks“The law will not hear the guilty party say, `You were yourself guilty of negligence,' or `You ought not to have trusted me.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Kearns v. Sparks
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.