Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Mont. 122 - State v. Satterfield

State v. Satterfield’s Empirical Analysis

1943

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
3
states following
February 1986
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 1986

17 state decisions

8019431950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on People v. Boggess · People v. Mccurdy · State v. Pemberton

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The objection that evidence is too remote is directed to the discretion of the court and is a matter that goes to the credibility of the evidence rather than to its admissibility * * * unless the remoteness is so great that the proffered evidence has no evidentiary value.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.