Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Nev. 1285 - Hennie v. State

Hennie v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2021

5 state decisions

201998200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sanborn v. State · Callier v. Warden · King v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he court may grant a new trial to a defendant if required as a matter of law or on the ground of newly discovered evidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “it could not have been discovered and produced for trial even with the exercise of reasonable diligence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “if the witness impeached is so important that impeachment would necessitate a different verdict”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.