Lane v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently December 2024
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian Tribe · Fulbright v. United States · 37 Cal. 3d 731 - People v. Bigelow · Melendez v. United States · 337 So. 2d 783 - Provence v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“conviction [could] not be aggravated by both the robbery and the receipt of money stolen during that robbery.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[u]nder Nevada law, [the defendant] could not be convicted of both robbery and receiving stolen property,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.