State v. Kurley’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently February 2019
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Swafford v. State · State v. Osborne · State v. Segotta · Northern Pueblos Enterprises. v. Montgomery · State v. Jim
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The manner in which a crime is committed can bear on a number of factors relevant to sentencing, including [the] defendant's propensity to repeat the crime, the potential for harm resulting from the crime, and [the] defendant's potential for rehabilitation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Quintana“[T]he brutality of the crime was ... a circumstance surrounding the crime that could be considered by the trial court in aggravating [the] defendant's sentence.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Quintana
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.