Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 N.M. 607 - Carrillo v. Rostro

Carrillo v. Rostro’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

117
cited by 117 later decisions
5
states following
October 2019
most recently cited

115 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 117 later decisions — most recently October 2019 · most notably Handmaker v. Henney (1999), State v. Apodaca (1997)

115 state decisions

650199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1292 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Anderson v. Creighton · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 117 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The collateral order doctrine is a “narrow exception,” whose reach is limited to trial court orders affecting rights that will be irretrievably lost in the absence of an immediate appeal. To fall within the exception, an order must at a minimum satisfy three conditions: It must “conclusively determine the disputed question,” “resolve an important issue completely separate from the merits of the action,” and “be effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “allow interruption of trial court proceedings by any party claiming hardship because of postponement of review[,]”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[A]n adjudication [denying a motion for summary judgment based on qualified immunity] does not determine that defendants are liable ... Establishing the defendants' liability or nonliability must await the outcome of the trial that a denial of summary judgment entails.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.