Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 N.M. 668 - State v. Baca

State v. Baca’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
4
states following
July 2022
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently July 2022 · most notably State v. NICK R. (2009), Commonwealth v. Adjutant (2005)

3 federal appellate · 42 state decisions

1701992200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Energy Cooperative, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Co. · Mayers v. United States · Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. United States · Bagley v. IBP, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the defendant acted under unlawful and imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury, (2) the defendant did not find [herself] in a position that compelled [her] to violate the law due to [her] own recklessness, (3) [the defendant] had no reasonable legal alternative, and (4) [the defendant's] illegal conduct was directly caused by the threat of harm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Specifically, the elements of immediacy and reasonableness must be construed narrowly so that the high level of protection afforded by a statute [implicating] strict liability is not vitiated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[w]e agree with the federal courts that 'the keystone of the analysis is that the defendant must have no alternative — either before or during the event — to avoid violating the law.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.