Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 N.M. 721 - State v. Platt

State v. Platt’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently September 2011

15 state decisions

80199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Griffin v. United States · Mascarenas v. Jaramillo · State v. Carr · State v. McKay · State v. Barela

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]t is unlawful for a person to issue in exchange for anything of value, with intent to defraud, any check, ... knowing at the time of the issuing that the offender has insufficient funds in or credit with the bank ... for the payment of such check ... in full upon its presentation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “parties intended to have a cash transaction,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.