Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Ohio App. 3d 153 - State v. Pearson

114 Ohio App. 3d 153 - State v. Pearson’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
July 2021
most recently cited

17 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2021

17 state decisions

901996200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Gates · Katz v. United States · United States v. Leon · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Spinelli v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the State's argument [that the inevitable discovery doctrine applies because the police possessed probable cause and could have obtained a search warrant] would obviate any Fourth Amendment warrant requirement as long as it could be show later that a warrant would in all probability have been obtained”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.