114 Ohio App. 3d 306 - State v. Jones’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
27 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2025 · most notably 120 Ohio App. 3d 122 - State v. Aldridge (1997), 150 Ohio App. 3d 676 - State v. Kovac (2002)
27 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · State v. Jenks · 20 Ohio App. 3d 172 - State v. Martin · State v. Dehass · State v. Lott
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“review[s] the entire record, weighs the evidence and all reasonable inferences, considers the credibility of witnesses and determines whether in resolving conflicts in the evidence, the jury clearly lost its way and created such a manifest miscarriage of justice that the conviction must be reversed and a new trial ordered. The discretionary power to grant a new trial should be exercised only in the exceptional case in which the evidence weighs heavily against the conviction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“fingerprints from the King residence for comparison purposes. We agree with the State that the fact that Blake was not still carrying a flashlight when apprehended is of little significance. {¶ 41} When determining whether a conviction is against the manifest weight of the evidence, a reviewing court considers”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, whether any reasonable trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.