114 Ohio App. 3d 327 - State v. Klosterman’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

3 federal appellate · 82 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 85 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “manifest objective good faith in relying on a warrant based on an affidavit 'so lacking in indicia of probable cause as to render official belief in its existence entirely unreasonable.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Dibble · State v. Belmontes

2. “[t]he officer cannot claim good faith reliance on a search warrant based on less than probable cause where he has failed to place in the affidavit information known to him that would support probable cause. The officer's reliance on the warrant can be objectively reasonable only if his belief that the affidavit contains facts sufficient to create probable cause is itself objectively reasonable.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Belmontes

3. “Information supporting probable cause that is known to the affiant, but not included in the affidavit or revealed to the Magistrate prior to the issuance of the warrant is not pertinent to the determination of whether an objectively reasonable officer should have known that the warrant was not based on probable cause.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
   e.g. State v. Fry, Unpublished Decision (8-11-2006)