¶1 concurring.
¶2 Though I agree with the majority’s reasoning as to the weapon’s characteristics as a firearm, I write separately only to make the point that the resolution of the third assignment of error is not dependent on that analysis. As to the aggravated robbery charge, the item carried need not necessarily be a firearm, but could be a deadly weapon. See State v. Powers (1995), 106 Ohio App.3d 696, 667 N.E.2d 32.