State v. Bezak’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 657 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 668 later decisions — most recently May 2022 · most notably State v. Kalish (2008), State v. Fischer (2010)
2 federal appellate · 657 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Comer · State v. Jordan · State v. Saxon · State v. Beasley · State v. Brooks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 668 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]hen a defendant is convicted of or pleads guilty to one or more offenses and postrelease control is not properly included in a sentence for a particular offense, the sentence for that offense is void. The offender is entitled to a new sentencing hearing for that particular offense.”
64 later decisions quote this exact passage“is required to notify the offender at the sentencing hearing about postrelease control and is further required to incorporate that notice into its journal entry imposing sentence.”
10 later decisions quote this exact passage“summarily reimpose the original sentence.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.