114 Or. App. 64 - Saif Corp. v. Herron’s Empirical Analysis
1992
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
October 1992
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Whipple v. Howser · Pummel v. United Supermarkets of Oklahoma, Inc. · McKean-Coffman v. Employment Division · Cal-Roof Wholesale, Inc. v. State Tax Commission · State v. Leathers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"And the other exception is the litigation exception. For once, our legislature has recognized that there are actually tens of thousands of cases in litigation and we're not going to reinvent the wheel on those cases. We will let those cases proceed under the standards in which they were tried, so that you, again, will not be creating more work for lawyers." Tape Recording, House Special Session, Floor Debate, May 7, 1990, Tape 2, Side A at 260.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“although Mannix's language was inaccurate, it is possible for us to glean his meaning.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.