State v. Stevenson’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
20 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 2024
20 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Connally v. General Construction Co. · 119 Wash. 2d 192 - State v. Salinas · Lockheed Shipbuilding Co. v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs · 115 Wash. 2d 60 - State v. Camarillo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A person commits the crime of voyeurism if, for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of any person, he or she knowingly views, photographs, or films . . . [t]he intimate areas of another person without that person's knowledge and consent and under circumstances where the person has a reasonable expectation of privacy, whether in a public or private place.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A statute is unconstitutionally vague if [it] does not (1) define the criminal offense with sufficient definiteness such that ordinary persons understand what conduct is proscribed or (2) provide ascertainable standards of guilt to protect against arbitrary enforcement.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Parmelee v. O'NEEL · State v. Boyd“if persons of common intelligence must necessarily guess at its meaning and differ as to its application.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Parmelee v. O'NEEL · State v. Boyd
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.