Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 PACOMMW 270 - Jackson v. Commonwealth

Jackson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
December 2003
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Rivenbark v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole · Rivenbark v. COM. PA. BD. OF PROB. & P. · 103 Pa. Commw. 602 - Jones v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & Parole

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Commission of crime during parole; other violations of terms of parole (a) Convicted Violators. Any parolee under the jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Board of Parole released from any penal institution of the Commonwealth who, during the period of parole or while delinquent on parole, commits any crime punishable by imprisonment, from which he is convicted or found guilty by a judge or jury or to which he pleads guilty or nolo contendere at any time thereafter in a court of record, may, at the discretion of the board, be recommitted as a parole violator.... [[Image here]] (b) Technical Violators. Any parolee under the jurisdiction of the Pennsylvania Board of Parole released from any penal institution in the Commonwealth who, during the period of parole, violates the terms and conditions of his parole, other than by the commission of a new crime of which he is convicted or found guilty by a judge or jury or to which he pleads guilty or nolo contende-re in a court of record, may be recommitted after hearing before the board.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.