Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 So. 2d 8 - Romy v. Dade County

114 So. 2d 8 - Romy v. Dade County’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
February 1983
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently February 1983

13 state decisions

801959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Baruch v. Giblen · 108 So. 2d 289 - Jacksonville Express. Auth. v. Henry G. Du Pree Co. · Folmar v. Davis · 110 So. 2d 687 - Orange State Oil Co. v. Jacksonville Express. Auth. · Dratch v. Dade County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"This court previously has followed and applied the rule that in the determination of the value of an attorney's services, testimony of qualified experts, though strongly persuasive, is not binding on a court or jury but is to be weighed with other evidence and factors appearing in the case and bearing upon the value of such services. Folmar v. Davis, Fla.App. 1959, 108 So.2d 772 . See, also, Baruch v. Giblin, 122 Fla. 59 , 164 So. 831 . "The rule thus enunciated was applied by this court in the case of Dratch v. Dade County, Fla.App. 1958, 105 So.2d 171, 174 , and we hold here, as was held in the Dratch case, that in the trial of an eminent domain case `the court should not instruct the jury as to a definite amount to be awarded for attorneys' fees unless it is stipulated between petitioner and defendants.'"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.