Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

114 So. 3d 291

Moore v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-04-24

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2017

9 state decisions

Relies on Lafler v. Cooper · Missouri v. Frye · Simmons v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-04-24

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm the trial court’s denial of appellant’s untimely motion for postconviction relief which attempted to challenge his 1996 conviction. Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012), and Missouri v. Frye, — U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012), did not create any new fundamental constitutional right, and these decisions do not provide any exception to the time limitation for seeking postconviction relief. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.850(b)(2); Simmons v. State, 104 So.3d 1185 (Fla. 1st DCA 2012).

¶2Affirmed.

WARNER, STEVENSON and GROSS, JJ., concur.
/114/so3d/291 · .json · Public domain