Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

114 So. 3d 422

State v. Foster

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2013-05-31

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently September 2017

2 state decisions

Relies on Pickle v. State · WHITCHARD v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2013-05-31

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The State appeals the trial court’s order withholding adjudication on Andrew Joseph Foster’s first-degree felony conviction.1 The withhold of adjudication was entered after Foster entered an open no-contest plea to the sale or possession of a controlled substance with intent to sell within 1000 feet of a school or child care facility. See § 402.302, Fla. Stat. (2010). Commendably, Foster concedes error, based upon the plain language of section 775.08435(l)(a), Florida Statutes (2012), which prohibits a court from withholding an adjudication of guilt upon a defendant who commits a first-degree felony, and State v. Joseph, 995 So.2d 1182 (Fla. 2nd DCA 2008) (recognizing that section 775.08435(l)(a) prohibits trial courts from withholding an adjudication of guilt on a defendant convicted of a first-degree felony). See also State v. Ketchum, 111 So.3d 197 (Fla. 3d DCA 2013).

¶2Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s withhold of adjudication and remand for entry of an adjudication of guilt.

¶3REVERSED and REMANDED.

GRIFFIN, PALMER and TORPY, JJ., concur.

¶4. Appellate review is authorized under rule 9.140(c)(l)(L) of the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure.

/114/so3d/422 · .json · Public domain