Whitaker v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Barker v. Wingo · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · Beavers v. Haubert · Evans v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“While a comment by a single prospective juror during voir dire may taint the entire panel, where there is no evidence of such a taint, the court may correctly refuse to disqualify the entire panel from service if the jury affirms that it can render a verdict based solely on the evidence brought before the court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]he decision to declare a mistrial is within the sound discretion of the trial judge.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.