Van Norman v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 975 So. 2d 219 - Callins v. State · 849 So. 2d 95 - Russell v. State · 834 So. 2d 687 - City of Jackson v. Lipsey · 904 So. 2d 116 - Hersick v. State · 867 So. 2d 196 - Crawford v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) the new evidence was discovered after the trial; (2) it could not by due diligence have been discovered prior to trial; (3) it is material to the issue and not merely cumulative or impeaching; and (4) the new evidence will probably produce a different result or verdict in the new trial.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“Relief must be denied if the movant fails to meet any one of these four elements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.