Williams v. Daus’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 18 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Mease · Rodriguez v. Suzuki Motor Corp. · Bynote v. National Super Markets, Inc. · Hill Ex Rel. Hill v. Boles · State v. Daniels
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“However, it is permissible to elicit testimony about juror misconduct that occurred outside the jury room, such as the alleged gathering of extrinsic evidence at issue here. Even where the purpose of testimony regarding the misconduct (whether it occurred inside or outside the jury room) is to impeach the verdict, the party complaining of the testimony must make a timely and proper objection or else the issue is waived,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. McBride v. Farley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.