Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 SW3D 818 - Brooks v. Commonwealth

Brooks v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

2003

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2014
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · Barber v. Page · Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Roberts · Stoner v. Sowders · Bell v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “prolonged loss or impairment of the function of a bodily organ.” The Commonwealth has not offered any justification for a finding of prolonged impairment of the function of Henderson’s hand. Furthermore, the Commonwealth has not asserted that Henderson's injury constituted a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.