¶1ORDER
¶2The State appeals the motion court’s grant of Mark Dudley’s Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief, following an evi-dentiary hearing. Mr. Dudley cross-appeals the denial of his four other claims for *889relief in his post-conviction motion. Since a published opinion would have no prece-dential value, a memorandum has been provided to the parties.
¶3The judgment of the motion court is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).