Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 WASH 623 - Levine v. Barry

Levine v. Barry’s Empirical Analysis

1921

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
6
states following
April 2021
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently April 2021

19 state decisions

4019211930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on STANTON v. Embrey, Administrator · Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. Falvey · Barfield v. South Highlands Infirmary · Randall v. . Packard · West Chicago Street Railway Co. v. Fishman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . The expert witness, because of his superior knowledge of the subject about which he is testifying, may be a very useful or a very misleading, of even dangerous, witness, and as to him the rules of cross-examination should be liberalized rather than restricted. We think the general practice in the trial courts of this state has been in accordance with the views we have announced and that such practice has grown’ up' because it tended to bring about justice. Of course, the rule' may be, and in fact often is, abused, but the trial court is always in position to stop the abuse. The rule is not to be condemned because of the inclination to abuse it, when the remedy is at hand.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The cross-examiner may rightfully propound hypothetical questions based entirely on conjectural facts for the purpose of testing the skill and knowledge of the witness, . . . ” (Italics ours.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.