Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Wash. 2d 724 - State v. Marks

114 Wash. 2d 724 - State v. Marks’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably Marks v. Clarke (1996), 64 Wash. App. 796 - State v. Alaway (1992)

3 federal appellate · 28 state decisions

130199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Morrison · United States v. Blue · United States v. Morrison · United States v. Wright · 78 Wash. 2d 327 - State v. Baker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he court, in the furtherance of justice, after notice and hearing, may dismiss any criminal prosecution due to arbitrary action or governmental misconduct when there has been prejudice to the rights of the accused which materially affect the accused's right to a fair trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[d]ismissal is unwarranted in cases where suppression of evidence may eliminate whatever prejudice is caused by governmental misconduct.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “[W]e have not suggested that searches and seizures contrary to the Fourth Amendment warrant dismissal of the indictment. The remedy in the criminal proceeding is limited to denying the prosecution the fruits of its transgression.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.