Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 114 Wash. 2d 867 - State v. Henderson

114 Wash. 2d 867 - State v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis

1990

Citation profile

125
cited by 125 later decisions
5
states following
June 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 120 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 125 later decisions — most recently June 2021 · most notably 128 Wash. 2d 896 - State v. LeFaber (1996), State v. Studd (1999)

3 federal appellate · 120 state decisions

6301990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McComb v. Jacksonville Paper Co. · Walker v. Illinois · 105 Wash. 2d 692 - State v. Kwan Fai Mak · 105 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Bergeron · 91 Wash. 2d 342 - State v. Boyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “recognized the constitutional requirement that the prosecution bear the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt each element of the crime charged. It is against this constitutional test that a challenged instruction may be measured. In this case, however, we do not reach the constitutional issue. The instruction given is one which the defendant himself proposed.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “even if error was committed, of whatever kind, it was at the defendant's invitation and he is therefore precluded from claiming on appeal that it is reversible error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Under the invited error doctrine, a defendant may not request that instructions be given to the jury and then complain upon appeal that the instructions are constitutionally infirm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.