Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 115 A3D 1173 - Leal v. Meeks

Leal v. Meeks’s Empirical Analysis

2015

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
3
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

2 district · 8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Weinberger v. UOP, Inc. · Smith v. Van Gorkom · Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. · Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co. · 33 Del. Ch. 293 - Sterling v. Mayflower Hotel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A plaintiff seeking only monetary damages must plead non-exculpated claims against a director who is protected by an exculpatory charter provision to survive a motion, to dismiss, regardless of the underlying standard of review for the board’s conduct— be it Revlon, Unocal, the entire fairness standard, or the business judgment rule.” (citations omitted)); Marciano v. Nakash, 535 A.2d 400, 405 (Del.1987) (”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.